RAISE A TOAST TO INDIA’S GDP GROWTH
When the MOSPI published the GDP data for Q4FY24 and for the full fiscal year FY24, it did come as a pleasant surprise. The fourth quarter GDP growth at 7.6% was substantially better than the street estimates of around 6.5%. After growing at over 8% in the first 3 quarters, the 7.6% growth in the fourth quarter ensured that the full year FY24 GDP growth stood at a healthy 8.2%. For the last 3 years, India has been the fastest growing large economy. We are only talking about economies with GDP more than $1 Trillion to make the sample more comparable. This is the third year in a row that India has been the fastest growing large economy. However, the GDP numbers also beat the government’s own expectations.
The legendary playwright George Bernard Shaw once said, “If all the economists in the world were laid end to end, they would still not reach a conclusion.” Perhaps a much better definition was provided by Steven Levitt, the highly celebrated author of “Freakonomics.” According to Levitt, the problem is that most economists think almost alike; and that seems to be the problem here. They all began with the assumption that GDP would be tepid in the fourth quarter, ignoring the momentum of the first three quarters. Then, why did the government get it wrong? Most likely, the government was being cautious, especially considering the upcoming elections, when it projected full year GDP growth of just 7.6% in February 2024. As the business wisdom goes, “it is always better to under-promise and over-deliver.” Lighter part of economics apart, let us move to the GDP story.
HOW GDP GROWTH EVOLVED IN Q4-FY24
The table captures the item-wise segregation. To get a more realistic picture, we have considered the GVA growth. GVA is GDP is more realistic as it is shorn of the impact of taxes and subsidies.
Real Sectoral Growth (%) |
Q1 FY23 |
Q2
FY23 |
Q3
FY23 |
Q4
FY23 |
Q1
FY24 |
Q2
FY24 |
Q3
FY24 |
Q4
FY24 |
Agriculture | 2.66 | 2.27 | 5.19 | 7.64 | 3.74 | 1.74 | 0.40 | 0.57 |
Mining / Quarrying | 6.56 | -4.13 | 1.37 | 2.87 | 7.05 | 11.07 | 7.50 | 4.25 |
Manufacturing | 2.18 | -7.19 | -4.78 | 0.95 | 4.95 | 14.30 | 11.54 | 8.94 |
Utilities | 15.55 | 6.41 | 8.65 | 7.30 | 3.17 | 10.53 | 8.97 | 7.69 |
Construction | 14.69 | 6.85 | 9.47 | 7.41 | 8.57 | 13.55 | 9.58 | 8.70 |
Trade/Hotels | 22.09 | 13.20 | 9.17 | 6.97 | 9.69 | 4.51 | 6.95 | 5.13 |
Financial Services | 10.49 | 8.71 | 7.69 | 9.18 | 12.61 | 6.24 | 6.98 | 7.58 |
Defence and admin | 23.59 | 7.30 | 3.52 | 4.66 | 8.25 | 7.75 | 7.51 | 7.77 |
Real GVA | 11.34 | 5.04 | 4.83 | 6.03 | 8.26 | 7.69 | 6.79 | 6.27 |
Net Taxes | 37.60 | 10.66 | -2.56 | 7.66 | 7.94 | 12.65 | 31.23 | 22.15 |
Real GDP | 12.81 | 5.46 | 4.26 | 6.18 | 8.24 | 8.08 | 8.57 | 7.76 |
Data Source: MOSPI – all are percentage growth figures (in %)
Before we go ahead, it must be noted that all of the above are real growth data, which is net of the inflation effect, and we shall look at the nominal data also at a later stage. Here are some of the key takeaways from the real GVA / GDP data above.
In a nutshell, the growth numbers have flattered, despite a rather disappointing show by agriculture output. Manufacturing and services have been very robust overall.
HOW NOMINAL GDP ESTIMATES LOOK FOR Q4-FY24
Nominal GDP is the value of GDP before the impact of inflation. While real GDP is the default reference, the nominal GDP has implications for tax revenues and job creation.
Nominal Sectoral Growth (%) |
Q1 FY23 |
Q2
FY23 |
Q3
FY23 |
Q4
FY23 |
Q1
FY24 |
Q2
FY24 |
Q3
FY24 |
Q4
FY24 |
Agriculture | 13.19 | 10.19 | 6.70 | 9.01 | 4.43 | 8.06 | 5.11 | 4.56 |
Mining / Quarrying | 40.60 | 15.16 | 7.46 | -2.46 | 1.29 | 12.02 | 6.23 | 7.03 |
Manufacturing | 13.93 | 0.62 | -0.17 | 3.47 | 2.11 | 11.94 | 10.55 | 7.72 |
Utilities | 10.03 | 6.78 | 4.12 | -1.22 | 13.47 | 9.32 | 5.56 | 11.16 |
Construction | 33.81 | 18.43 | 15.47 | 11.07 | 6.26 | 12.92 | 10.53 | 8.52 |
Trade/Hotels | 38.97 | 25.24 | 15.08 | 9.16 | 7.14 | 4.35 | 7.68 | 5.83 |
Financial Services | 24.07 | 19.93 | 15.45 | 15.27 | 12.73 | 7.87 | 9.28 | 9.52 |
Defence and admin | 30.35 | 14.00 | 9.31 | 11.02 | 13.86 | 14.10 | 13.16 | 13.08 |
Nominal GVA | 24.16 | 14.75 | 9.82 | 9.21 | 8.22 | 9.26 | 8.72 | 7.97 |
Net Taxes | 41.03 | 17.07 | 5.06 | 8.98 | 10.90 | 13.14 | 28.21 | 32.95 |
Nominal GDP | 25.52 | 14.95 | 9.41 | 9.19 | 8.46 | 9.61 | 10.35 | 9.90 |
Data Source: MOSPI – all are percentage growth figures (in %)
As we stated earlier, the nominal GDP and GVA numbers are relevant as they hint at the impact of GDP gross of taxes. Here is a quick comparison of the nominal and real GVA and GDP numbers.
The quick takeaway from the above table is that Indian economy is growing at a much better pace in nominal terms and in real terms too. It is true that services are driving growth more than manufacturing, but that is understandable.
REAL AND NOMINAL GROWTH FOR FY24 (ACTUAL DATA)
Having looked at the real and nominal performance of GVA growth for the fourth quarter and a comparison of the previous quarters, let us now turn to the actual data for the full fiscal year FY24. The table below captures real GVA growth for FY24, compared to FY23.
Sector | GVA FY22
(₹ in Crore) |
GVA FY23
(₹ in Crore) |
GVA FY24
(₹ in Crore) |
FY23 Growth (%) |
FY24 Growth (%) |
Agriculture | 21,70,106 | 22,72,250 | 23,04,982 | 4.71 | 1.44 |
Mining / Quarrying | 3,09,276 | 3,15,256 | 3,37,623 | 1.93 | 7.09 |
Manufacturing | 25,61,033 | 25,04,663 | 27,51,680 | -2.20 | 9.86 |
Utilities | 3,17,966 | 3,47,973 | 3,74,174 | 9.44 | 7.53 |
Construction | 11,93,532 | 13,06,256 | 14,36,081 | 9.44 | 9.94 |
Trade/Hotels | 24,80,380 | 27,77,723 | 29,55,767 | 11.99 | 6.41 |
Financial Services | 31,22,847 | 34,05,474 | 36,91,645 | 9.05 | 8.40 |
Defence and admin | 17,21,699 | 18,75,304 | 20,21,798 | 8.92 | 7.81 |
GVA at Basic Prices | 1,38,76,840 | 1,48,04,901 | 1,58,73,751 | 6.69 | 7.22 |
Data Source: MOSPI
The real GVA growth for FY24 is 53 bps better than in FY23, which shows that, shorn of taxes and subsidies, FY24 has still been better than FY23. If you compare the FY24 data with the actuals for FY23, then clearly it is agriculture that is sharply down and putting pressure. On yoy basis, agricultural growth is down 327 bps. Trade / hotels and financial services have also tapered due to the early enthusiasm of contact intensive services waning. However, the real thrust came from mining and manufacturing. While real mining growth jumped from 1.93% to 7.09%, the real manufacturing growth has turned around from -2.20% to 9.86% in FY24. Manufacturing has done better than the FY24 estimates at the end of third quarter. Let us now turn to the nominal growth in GVA for FY24 versus FY23.
Sector | GVA FY22
(₹ in Crore) |
GVA FY23
(₹ in Crore) |
GVA FY24
(₹ in Crore) |
FY23 Growth (%) |
FY24 Growth (%) |
Agriculture | 40,99,473 | 44,84,268 | 47,25,223 | 9.39 | 5.37 |
Mining / Quarrying | 4,39,339 | 4,94,602 | 5,25,881 | 12.58 | 6.32 |
Manufacturing | 33,92,605 | 35,36,461 | 38,19,749 | 4.24 | 8.01 |
Utilities | 5,77,793 | 6,04,209 | 6,63,458 | 4.57 | 9.81 |
Construction | 18,35,674 | 21,78,693 | 23,83,877 | 18.69 | 9.42 |
Trade/Hotels | 36,74,918 | 44,10,148 | 46,84,542 | 20.01 | 6.22 |
Financial Services | 46,45,873 | 55,20,163 | 60,64,251 | 18.82 | 9.86 |
Defence and admin | 29,69,909 | 34,30,497 | 38,95,167 | 15.51 | 13.55 |
GVA at Basic Prices | 2,16,35,584 | 2,46,59,041 | 2,67,62,147 | 13.97 | 8.53 |
Data Source: MOSPI
That is where the dichotomy is more pronounced. While real GVA growth for FY23 and FY24 have been at par, the nominal growth for FY24 at 8.53% is sharply lower than the nominal growth of 13.97% in FY23. The difference is that inflation has been controlled a lot better in FY24 as a direct outcome of the hawkish policies adopted by the RBI. However, this fall has had its impact on the ability of the government to enhance its capex outlay for FY25.
READING THROUGH THE MAZE OF GDP NUMBERS
The GDP growth and the GVA growth for Q4 has been much better than the street expectations and also the government’s own projections. That is a good problem to have. However, here are some key takeaways from the numbers.
a. As expected, the government did a lot better than its own estimates of GDP growth for FY24. While agricultural growth has been tepid and some of the contact intensive sectors have not maintained the momentum, the turnaround in FY24 comes from mining, quarrying, and manufacturing. The manufacturing thrust comes from better capacity utilization and robust order book positions.
b. The GDP announcement must be seen in conjunction with two other data points. Firstly, the core sector data announced on the same day as the GDP data came in at 6.2% for April 2024. That is a signal that the slightly slowdown in capex spending by the government has not really impacted the pace of GDP growth. That means; the lag effect of the capex and the downstream effects are still functioning. One only hopes that part of the RBI largesse in the form of ₹2.11 Trillion dividend for FY25 will go towards boost capex spending in FY25.
d. But the big cause of celebration is the sharp fall in the fiscal deficit. For FY24 the interim budget had aggressively reduced the fiscal deficit from 5.9% to 5.8% of GDP. The actual fiscal deficit data has come in at 5.6% of GDP, which is incredibly lower than estimated. It puts the Indian economy to pull down the fiscal deficit below 5% in FY25 and below 4.5% in FY26. After all, when the going is good, it is also the best time to take care of fiscal prudence.
Overall, the GDP growth for Q4 and for FY24 appears to have flattered on the upside. It has surprised some and amazed many. For now, it is time to raise a toast to the incredible India growth story!
Related Tags
Invest wise with Expert advice
IIFL Customer Care Number
(Gold/NCD/NBFC/Insurance/NPS)
1860-267-3000 / 7039-050-000
IIFL Capital Services Support WhatsApp Number
+91 9892691696
IIFL Capital Services Limited - Stock Broker SEBI Regn. No: INZ000164132, PMS SEBI Regn. No: INP000002213,IA SEBI Regn. No: INA000000623, SEBI RA Regn. No: INH000000248
ARN NO : 47791 (AMFI Registered Mutual Fund Distributor)
This Certificate Demonstrates That IIFL As An Organization Has Defined And Put In Place Best-Practice Information Security Processes.